BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS / Šturma, Mozetic (eds)

(verstehen) what one wants to interpret. This precedent ( ver-stehen) is the condition of possibility for the jurists: the Constitution. The fundamental right to a constitutionally appropriate response does not imply the systemic development of definitive responses because the pretense of seeking definitive answers is, in itself, anti-hermeneutic in the sense that doing so would freeze meanings . The fundamental right to an appropriate response to the Constitution is more than a settlement from a democratic perspective, such as equitable treatment and respect for the contradictory and democratic output of the legislature. Rather, this right is a philosophical product because it is a standard-bearer of a new paradigm that goes beyond the subject-object scheme prevalent in both classic and modern metaphysics.

91