Common European Asylum System in a Changing World

In case of an expiration of residence documents this criterion remains valid for another two years, in case of visas for another six months – after these periods, criterion of lodging the application will apply. c) Criterion of entry and/or stay If an applicant has irregularly crossed the border into a Member State by land, sea, or air having come from a third country, the Member State of entry shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection. That responsibility shall cease 12 months after the date on which the irregular border crossing took place. When a Member State cannot or can no longer be held responsible in accordance with the criterion of illegal entry and where it is established that the applicant — who has entered the territories of the Member States irregularly — has been living for a continuous period of at least five months in a Member State before lodging the application for international protection, that Member State shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection. d) Visa waived entry If a third-country national or a stateless person enters into the territory of a Member State in which they do not need a visa, that Member State shall be responsible for examining their application for international protection. This criterion is not actually applicable in practice because common visa policy exists within the EU – the EU has a common list of visa-waived countries. e) Criterion “international airport” If the application for international protection is made in the international transit area of an airport of a Member State, that Member State shall be responsible for examining the application. f) Criterion “lodging application” Where no Member State responsible can be designated on the basis of the criteria, the first Member State in which the application for international protection was lodged shall be responsible for examining it. This criterion is called the “remaining criterion”.  For unaccompanied minors these general rules apply: – The Member State responsible shall be that where a family member or a sibling of the unaccompanied minor is legally present, provided that it is in the best interests of the minor . – In the absence of a family member, a sibling, or a relative the Member State responsible shall be that where the unaccompanied minor has lodged the application for international protection, provided that it is in the best interests of the minor . Furthermore, the regulation also sets rules also for specific situation such as married minors or the situation where family members are present in more Member States. The best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration for Member States with respect to all procedures provided for in this Regulation. In assessing the best interests of the child, Member States shall in particular, take due account of the following factors:

42