CYIL 2012

THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN 2011 that were struck out and five fell into the category “other judgments”). 6 The high variability in the numbers of judgments is closely connected to the subject matter of cases, which is going to be introduced in the next section. Table 2: Development of number of violations of rights (2002 – 2011) 7

Violations by rights / Year Right to liberty and security

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total

0

0

0

3

1

3

5

2

6

1

21

2 0

1 4

3

10

8

1 3

12

1 0

3 1

13 54

Right to a fair trial

26 15 27

0

2

78

Length of proceedings

Right to respect for private and family life

0

0

0

0

5

6

1

0

1

2

15

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

Freedom of expression

Freedom of assembly and association Right to an effective remedy

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

3

4

4

0

0

0

1

1

14

2

0

0

0

2

0

2

1

2

0

9

Protection of property

Prohibition of discrimination

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

5

6

32 32 49 14 20

4

14 19 195

Total

Source: authors based on Annual Reports of the ECtHR. The aforementioned high variability in numbers of judgments per year closely depends on the rise of violations of one particular right in a given year (see Table 2). For instance, from the years 2004 to 2006, in total, 68 violations of the right to a reasonable length of proceedings were declared. Similarly, there can be examples of years when the ECtHR found more than ten violations of a right to a fair trial in the Czech Republic. Otherwise, numbers of violations of specific rights in a given year are kept in single digit numbers. It might be worth looking at the structure of the violated rights – the Czech Republic in a clear majority of cases violates the fair trial rights (rights to a fair trial, to a reasonable length of proceedings and to an effective remedy). Though surely a very unpleasant nuisance in individual cases, the fair trial related rights are not among those “hard core” fundamental rights such as a right to life or an absolute ban on torture. The Strasbourg Court also issues judgments relatively frequently against the Czech Republic concerning a right to liberty and security and a right to respect for private and family life. Violations of other rights have only been declared less than ten times in a given year in the last decade. 6 Just satisfaction, revision, preliminary objections and lack of jurisdiction. 7 The number of violations of rights per year can be higher than the number of judgments in a given year, because one judgment can declare violations of multiple rights.

281

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker