CYIL 2014

COMPENSATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW of the International Tribunal for Law of the Sea. Additionally attention is given to legal issues such as the distinction between liability for lawful state conduct and state responsibility reflected in the legal regime of the Convention of the Law of the Sea. Another interesting issue is is the subject legally entitled for a reparation (ship owner or state of the flag of the ship). The cases of M/V Saiga and Corfu Channel are further analysed. Although not primarily a reparation, the author reflects on calculation of bail or financial guarantee as an useful analogy for calculating indemnification. Summary and recommendations The end of the publication provides concluding remarks about the results of the Specific University Research project concerning the relationship of a non-state actor claiming reparation from a state entity in the sphere of international public law. Interestingly, the conclusion of the publication does not end entirely by stating clear answers; on the other hand, it provides the reader with more concrete questions which can provide impetus for future research into the field of indemnification in international public law. The sources cited are comprised of abundant foreign literature and remarks by authors from Czech academia. As a whole, publication provides overview of indemnification with its different approaches in special regimes of international public law.

Tomáš Lipták*

* Mgr. Tomáš Lipták is PhD. Student at the Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, Charles University in Prague.

499