CYIL 2015
PETR VÁLEK CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ At the beginning of 2013 the Czech Republic and Austria prepared the first draft of the declaration. 25 Then they presented the draft to other EUMember States within COJUR and invited them to submit their comments and proposals of changes. In parallel, they informed the representatives of the Council of Europe members in March 2013 on this initiative at the 45 th meeting of CAHDI. Among many legal issues that were discussed during the drafting process, perhaps the two most difficult ones were the following: First, there were some doubts about the customary law status of the UN Convention and the relevant provisions, in spite of the above mentioned ICJ judgment and solid support in practice among the major lending and borrowing States in favor of these rules. 26 Second, the first draft contained a unequivocal commitment to present the declaration to a competent court, should a case arise. Nevertheless, this text was dropped due to different domestic legal systems of the EU Member States that do not always allow the Government to present such a document (or even an amicus curiae brief ) to a court. After circulating the draft several times, the Czech Republic and Austria made a conclusion that further negotiations would not bring any additional improvements to the text of declaration and prepared the document for signature under the title “Declaration on Jurisdictional Immunities of State-Owned Cultural Property” (hereinafter the “Declaration”). On 18 November 2013 the Czech Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Jan Kohout, and the Austrian Federal Minister for European and International Affairs, Mr. Michael Spindelegger, signed the Declaration in Brussels. The text of the Declaration reads as follows: “We, the undersigned, Desirous to strengthen international cooperation in the field of culture; Recognizing that the exchange of cultural property significantly contributes to the mutual understanding of nations; Resolved to promote the mobility of State-owned cultural property through temporary cross-border loans for public display; Aware of the need to reaffirm the international legal framework applicable to State-owned cultural property on public display in another State on the basis of the customary international law on State immunity, as codified in the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property of 2004 (hereinafter the “Convention”); Jointly declare the following: In accordance with customary international law as codified in the Convention
25 The author would like to also acknowledge Professor Hafner for his involvement in the drafting of the Declaration. 26 N. van Woudenberg, State Immunity and Cultural Objects on Loan, Leiden 2012, pp. 429-430.
396
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker