CYIL vol. 15 (2024)

LANH DINH CAO, TRINH THI HONG NGUYEN 3. Judgment No 46 /2019/KDTM-ST dated 30 Oct 2019 regarding disputes on a contract to organize an event between a Korean plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta460943t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an 4. Judgment No 50 /2019/KDTM-ST dated 13 Nov 2019 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a German plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta449347t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an Bình Dương Province People’s Court: 1. Judgment No 05 /2019/KDTM-ST dated 18 July 2019 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a Chinese plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta331039t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an 2. Judgment No 02 /2022/KDTM-ST dated 12 March 2022 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a Chinese plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015 although the court applied CISG under Art 1.1.a. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta909758t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an 3. Judgment No 04 /2022/KDTM-ST dated 31 March 2022 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a Chinese plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta1016315t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an 4. Judgment No 16 /2022/KDTM-ST dated 16 Sept 2022 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a Hong Kong plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta1090262t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an 5. Judgment No 18 /2022/KDTM-ST dated 26 Sept 2022 regarding disputes on a sales contract between a Singaporean plaintiff and a Vietnamese defendant. The decision did not mention Art 469 CPC 2015. Link: https://congbobanan.toaan.gov.vn/2ta1090257t1cvn/chi-tiet-ban-an Having described the method of judgment collection, the authors do not attempt or ensure the results from the conducted survey are one hundred percent accurate. Because the scan of judgments to locate international contractual disputes was done manually, judgments might be missed from the listed results. However, the authors have found no other useful methods to assure the collection of all judgments. The SPC has not publicized any similar report and neither has any law journal. At the same time, this research does not cover Vietnamese Court Decisions (such as Announcement of accepting jurisdiction, Announcement of returning jurisdiction, Decisions of successfully mediation or Decisions on suspending the settlement of civil cases), because they generally have not revealed basis of international jurisdiction that the cases was based upon.

292