CYIL vol. 9 (2018)
CYIL 9 ȍ2018Ȏ MITOCHONDRIAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN THE LIGHT OF THE CONVENTION… a treatment? And if treatment, what entity does it treat – the embryo, the future baby crying in a cradle, the donors of oocyte and sperm? Is it ethical to insert genes of a third person into a child, even though it resembles adding a grain of salt to the sea? Apart from these and many other questions, the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (hereinafter “the Convention on Biomedicine”) makes us wonder what the destiny of the genetic change will be. The answer is rather straightforward: a female embryo, having been born and grown up, will transmit the change to her descendants; however, a male embryo will never transmit the genetic change to his offspring. Since Article 13 prohibits any genetic modifications transmissible to the next generations, it seems that MRT could only be carried out in male embryos. We will call this possibility the practice of “selective MRT” and analyse whether it could be considered impermissible due to its discriminatory nature. Mitochondrial replacement therapy There are many controversies related to modern genetics in a medical context, ranging from the questions of safety of gene therapy 2 to prenatal genetic screening ethics 3 to embryo- destructive research. 4 Mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) represents one of the most controversial medical procedures these days. Carrying the media label of creation of “three- parent babies”, 5 MRT is destined to draw the public’s attention. However provoking its popular name is, it is also very inaccurate and rather misleading. A mitochondrion is an organelle, a specialized membrane-bound compartment within a cell, which is responsible for the production of the cell’s energy. 6 Depending on the cell type, there might be hundreds or even thousands of mitochondria in each cell: especially rich in mitochondria are liver cells which can contain about 2,000 mitochondria per cell. 7 Apart 2 The high sensitivity with which society approaches the risks of gene therapies may be illustrated by the case of Jesse Gelsinger, the first known person to have died in a gene therapy clinical trial in 1999, whose death significantly hindered the whole field of gene therapy for a very long time. See WILSON, James A. A History Lesson from Stem Cells. Science. (2009, Vol. 324, No. 5928), pp. 727-728.
281
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker