EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

Prague, Czechia

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

[12] European Commission, (2021). Statement of Objections against Apple in response to a complaint by the music streaming service Spotify: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/ presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2061 (‘ Statement of Objections’ ). [13] French Autorité de la concurrence decision (17 March 2021), Interactive Advertising Bureau France et al. [14] Geradin, D. and Katsifis, D. (2021). The Antitrust Case Against the Apple App Store. Journal of Competition Law & Economics . Vol 17, pp. 503–585. [15] Judgement of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 1991, Hilti AG v Commission, (T-30/89), EU:T:1991:70. [16] Judgment of the Court of 14 February 1978, United Brands v Commission, (C 27/76), EU:C:1978:22. [17] Judgment of the US 2 nd Circuit Court of Appeals , Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company , 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979). [18] Judgment of the US Supreme Court , Eastman Kodak Co v Image Technical Services (1992) 504 US 451. [19] Judgment of the US District Court (California), Epic, Inc., v Apple, Inc ., (10 September 2021), Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [20] Epic Games, Inc v Apple, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, (8 April 2021). Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH, (‘ Epic Findings of Fact’ ). [21] Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law , (7 April 2021) Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR, (‘ Apple Findings of Fact’ ). [22] Iyengar, R. (2021). Tim Cook defends Apple in blockbuster Fortnite trial: “It has nothing to do with money” CNN Business , 21 May 2021. Available at: https://amp. cnn.com/cnn/2021/05/21/tech/tim-cook-testimony-apple-epic/index.html [23] Judgment of the US 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals , Newcal Industries, Inc. v IKON Office Solution 513 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2008). [24] Judgment of the US Supreme Court , Ohio v. American Express Co., 138 S. Ct. 2274 (2018). [25] Judgment of the US 6 th Circuit Court of Appeals, PSI Repair Services v Honeywell, 104 F.3d 811 (6 th Cir. 1997) [26] Judgment of the US Supreme Court, Verizon Communications Inc., v Trinko , 540 U.S. 398 (2004). [27] Kotapati, B., Mutungi, S., Newham, M., Schroeder, J., Shao, S. and Wang, M. (2020). The Antitrust Case Against Apple. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3606073 [28] Kleinman, M. (2021). Fortnite-owner Epic Games worth $28bn as fundraising taps lockdown bonanza. 21 March 2021. Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/ fortnite-maker-epic-games-worth-28bn-after-lockdown-bonanza-12251432 [29] McMahon, K. (2022, forthcoming). ‘A re-evaluation of the abuse of excessive pricing’, in Research Handbook on Abuse of Dominance and Monopolization (Akman, P., Brook, O. and Stylianou, K. (eds)): Edward Elgar, Chapter 8.

107