EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

Prague, Czechia

[8] Decision of the European Commission of 6 December 2016, Microsoft/LinkedIn , COMP/M.8124. [9] Diaspora* (2021). About – the diaspora* project [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https://diasporafoundation.org/about [10] Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’), OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1–16 [11] Douek, E. (2021) Governing Online Speech: From “Posts-As-Trumps” To Propor tionality And Probability. Columbia Law Journal. Vol 121 No 3, pp. 759–834. [12] European Commission (2019). Competition Policy for the digital era [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/re ports/kd0419345enn.pdf [13] Electronic Frontier Foundation (2021). The Florida Deplatforming Law is Unconstitu tional. Always has Been [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https://www.eff.org/ deeplinks/2021/05/florida-deplatforming-law-unconstitutional-always-has-been [14] Fukuyama, F. et al. (2021). Middleware for Dominant Digital Platforms: A Technologi cal Solution to a Threat To Democracy [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https:// fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/cpc-middleware_ff_v2.pdf [15] Graef, I. (2016) EU competition law, data protection and online platforms: data as essen tial facility. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International [16] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 27 March 2012, Post Danmark A/S v Konkur rencerådet (C-209/10), EU:C:2012:172. [17] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 26 November 1998, Oscar Bronner (C-7/97), EU:C:1998:569. [18] Keller, D. (2021). The Future of Platform Power: Making Middleware Work. Journal of Democracy , Vol 32 No 3, pp. 168–172. [19] Klonick, K. (2017). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review . Vol 131, pp. 1598–1670. [20] Klonick, K. (2020) The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent In stitution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression. Yale Law Review . Vol 129 No 8, pp. 2418–2499. [21] Masnick, M. (2019). Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https://knightcolumbia.org/content/proto cols-not-platforms-a-technological-approach-to-free-speech [22] MarTech (2013). Twitter Reaches Spam Lawsuit Settlement With Tweet Adder [on line]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https://martech.org/twitter-reaches-spam-law suit-settlement-with-tweet-adder/ [23] Mastodon (2021). Mastodon.social [online]. [cit. 2021-12-22]. Available at: https:// mastodon.social/about/more

134