EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

Prague, Czechia

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

[52] Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 No vember 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, 2014. OJ L 349, 5.12.2014, p. 1–19 . [53] Final Judgment of the United States District Court of Columbia of 11 July 2018, United States v. Knorr-Bremse AG and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation , 1:18-cv-00747-CKK. [54] Fox, E.M., (1997). US and EU Competition Law: A Comparison, in: Graham, E.M., Richardson, J.D. (Eds.), Global Competition Policy, pp. 339–354. [55] Heaton, N., Holt, B. (Eds.) (2019). Private litigation: guide, GCR insight. Law Busi ness Research Ltd, London. [56] Hemphill, C.S., Rose, N.L. (2018). Mergers that Harm Sellers. Yale Law Journal, Vol 127, pp. 2078–2109. [57] Jones, A. (2016). Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law: A Comparison with, and Lessons from, the US, in: Bergstrom, M., Iacovides, M.C., Strand, M. (Eds.), Harmonising EU Competition Litigation – The New Directive and Beyond , Swedish Studies in European Law. Hart Publishing, pp. 15–42. [58] Judgement of the Court of Justice of 4 June 2009, T-Mobile Netherlands BV , (C 8/08), EU:C:2009:343. [59] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 December 1995, Bosman , (C-415/93), EU:C:1995:463. [60] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 September 1999, Becu , (C-22/98), EU:C:1999:419. [61] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 September 1999, Albany International BV contre Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds Textielindustrie (C-67/96), EU:C:1999:430. [62] Marinescu, I., Posner, E.A. (2020). Why has antitrust law failed workers ? Cornell Law Review, Vol 105, 1343–1394. [63] McCarthy, E., Maltas, A., Bay, M., Ruiz-Calzado, J. (2007). Litigation culture versus enforcement culture A comparison of US and EU plaintiff recovery actions in antitrust cases. The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2007 Global Competition Review , Vol 5. [64] Naidu, S., Posner, E.A., Weyl, E.G. (2018). Antitrust Remedies for Labor Market Power. Harvard Law Review, Vol 132, pp. 536–601. [65] Order by the United States Western District Court of Pennsylvania granting final approval of class action settlements and final judgment and order of dismissal In re Railway Industry Employee No-Poach Antitrust Litigation of 26 August 2020, 2:18-mc 00798-JFC. [66] Order of the United States Middle District Court of North Carolina of 22 May 2019 granting the United States of America’s unopposed motion to intervene in Seaman v. Duke University , 1:15-CV-462. [67] Posner, E.A. (2021). Chapter 1 - Labor Monopsony in the United States, in: How Antitrust Failed Workers.

399