EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

Prague, Czechia

slightly different priorities of these two legal orders in the area, it remains to be seen how close these different realities will come in the future. References [1] Abbott, Alden F. (2005). A Brief Comparison of European and American Antitrust Law [online]. [cit. 2022-01-19]. Available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxlaw/ cclp_l_02-05.pdf [2] Bradford, A. et al . (2019). The Global Dominance of European Competition Law Over American Antitrust Law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies , Vol 16 No 4, pp. 731v766. [3] Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown &Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 509 U.S. 209 (1993). [4] Coppola, M. and Nazzini, R., The European and U.S. Approaches to Antitrust and Tech: Setting the Record Straight - A Reply to Gregory J. Werden and Luke M. Froeb’s Antitrust and Tech: Europe and the United States Differ, and It Matters [online]. [cit. 2022-01-20]. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/key-speech es-presentations/europe-column-may-2020-full.pdf [5] Crane, Daniel A. (2009). Chicago, Post-Chicago, and Neo-Chicago. Review of How Chicago Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, by R. Pitofsky, editor. The University of Chicago Law Review , Vol 76 No 4, pp. 1911–1933. [6] Easterbrook Frank H. (1984). The Limits of Antitrust. Texas Law Review , Vol 63 No 1, pp. 1–40. [7] European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing (2014). European and US Com petition Policies: Similar Objectives, Difference Approaches. [online]. [cit. 2022 01-19]. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/brief ing/2014/140779/LDM_BRI(2014)140779_REV1_EN.pdf [8] Fox, Eleanor M. (2014). Monopolization and Abuse of Dominance: Why Europe is Different. The Antitrust Bulletin , Vol 59 No 1, pp. 129–152. [9] Fox, Eleanor M. (2019). Platforms, Power, and the Antitrust Challenge: A Modest Proposal to Narrow the US-Europe Divide. Nebraska Law Review , Vol 98 No 2, pp. 297–318. [10] Horton, Thomas J. (2012). Unraveling the Chicago/Harvard Antitrust Double He lix: Applying Evolutionary Theory to Guard Competitors and Revive Antitrust Jury Trials. University of Baltimore Law Review , Vol 41 No 4, pp. 615–670. [11] Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 1991, AKZO Chemie BV v Commis sion of the European Communities (Case C-62/86), EU:C:1991:286. [12] Khan, L. and Vaheesan, S. (2017). Market Power and Inequality: The Antitrust Counterrevolution and Its Discontents. Harvard Law & Policy Review , Vol 11 No 1, pp. 235–294. [13] Khan, Lina M. (2016–2017). Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. Yale Law Journal , Vol 126 No 3, pp. 710–805.

492