EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS
EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022
Prague, Czechia
[27] Judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 April 2020, Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (C-228/18), EU:C:2020:265. [28] Kindl, J., Dufková, B. (2021) Network Sharing and Counterfactual Analysis Under EU Competition law. In Competition and Telecommunications’ Network Sharing. Inter national Online Workshop, October 23, 2020 , Prague: Kairos, pp. 25–31. [29] Kindl, J. et al. (2021). Soutěžní právo. 3. vyd. [Competition Law. 3rd edn] Prague: C.H. Beck. [30] King, S. P. (2015). Sharing Economy: What Challenges for Competition Law? Jour nal of European Competition Law & Practice . Vol 6 No 10, pp. 729–734. [31] Kupčík, J. (2016). Why does Uber violate European competition laws? European Competition Law Review. Vol 37 No 11, pp. 469–472. [32] Lianos, I. (2007). Commercial Agency Agreements, Vertical Restraints, and the Lim its of Article 81(1) EC: Between Hierarchies and Networks. Journal of Competition Law & Economics , Vol 3 No 4, pp. 625–672. [33] Lougher, G., Kalmanowicz, S. (2016). EU Competition Law in the Sharing Econo my. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice . Vol 7 No 2, pp. 87–102. [34] Ménard, C., Shirley, M. M. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. [35] Ménard, C. (2008) A New Institutional Approach to Organization. In Ménard, C., Shirley, M. M. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Berlin, Hei delberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 281–318. [36] Ménard, C. (2021) Hybrids: where are we? Journal of Institutional Economics , doi:10.1017/S1744137421000230, pp. 1–16. [37] Nowag, J. (2015) Between an UBER Rock and an UBER Hard Place [online]. [cit. 2022 01-09]. Available at: https://lalibrecompetencia.com/2015/11/22/between-and-uber rock-and-an-uber-hard-place/. [38] Nowag, J. (2016). The UBER-Cartel? UBER between Labour and Competition Law. LundLawComp WP 1/2016 . Lund Student Law Review Working Paper Series. [39] Nowag, J. (2018). When sharing platforms fix sellers’ prices. Journal of Antitrust En forcement . Vol 6, pp. 382–408. [40] OECD (2018). Taxi, ride-sourcing and ride-sharing services – Background note by the Secretariat. [online]. [cit. 2022-01-01]. Available at: https://one.oecd.org/docu ment/DAF/COMP/WP2(2018)1/en/pdf. [41] Opinion of AG Szpunar of 11 May 2017, Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, SL (C-434/15), EU:C:2017:364. [42] Passaro, N. (2018). Uber Has an Antitrust Litigation Problem, Not an Antitrust Problem. CPI Antitrust Chronicle , May 2018, pp. 38–42. [43] Reimers, K., Guo, X., Li, M. (2019). Beyond markets, hierarchies, and hybrids: and institutional perspective on IT-enabled two-sided markets. Electronic Markets . Vol 29, pp. 287–305, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12525-018 0319-0.
552
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog