EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

Prague, Czechia

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

[5] Commission decision COMP/ M.2609 pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 4046/89, HP/Compaq, SG (2002) D/228300 , paras 39. [6] Commission Decision of 19 July 1991 declaring the compatibility with the common market of a concentration (Case No IV/M068 – Tetra Pak/Alfa-Laval) Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, OJ L 290, 22.10.1991, pp. 35–43. [7] Commission Decision of 4 December 1996 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No IV/M.774 – Saint-Gobain/Wacker-Chemie/NOM) (Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89), OJ L 247, 10.9.1997, pp. 1–46, para 184 . [8] Commission Decision of 3 May 2000 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89) (Case No COMP/M.1693 – Alcoa/Reynolds), OJ L 58, 28.2.2002, pp. 25– 55, paras 31–32 and 38. [9] Commission decision COMP/M.6281 pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 139/2004, Microsoft/ Skype , C(2011)7279, paras 78 and 99 . [10] Commission Decision of 3 October 2014 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.7217 – FACEBOOK / WHATSAPP) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, OJ C 7239, 03.10.2014, para 99 . [11] Commission Decision of 11 March 2008 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.4731 – Google/ DoubleClick), OJ C 184, 02.10.2007. [12] Commission Decision of 4 May 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40153 – E-Book MFNS and related matters) (notified under document C(2017) 2876), OJ C 264, 11.8.2017, pp. 7–10, para 58 . [13] Commission decision of 27 June 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39740 – Google Search (Shopping)) (notified under document number C(2017) 4444), OJ C 9, 12.1.2018, pp. 11–14, para 267. [14] Commission Decision of 18 July 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40099 – Google Android) (notified under document C(2018) 4761) 2019/C 402/08 C/2018/4761, OJ C 402, 28.11.2019, pp. 19–22, para 439 . [15] Commission Staff Working Document. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act), COM(2020) 842 final, SEC(2020) 437 final, SWD(2020) 363 final. [16] Communication from the Commission – Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, OJ C 45, 24.2.2009, pp. 7–20 .

79