Toothless European Citizenship / Šimon Uradnik
that until the uniform electoral procedure for the European Parliament is enacted, whereby the Member States would be dispensable in terms of that, it is not indeed possible to regard the voting rights related to the European Parliament elections as the nonvicarious contentrights. 4.2.2 Right of European Citizens’ Initiative Only the Treaty of Lisbon has introduced a concept of the initiative of Union citizens who are, in the spirit of that, empowered to nudge the European Commission, within the framework of its powers, to propose an actual legislative initiative. Whereby the role of Union citizens per se has stepped into the wellestablished tringle of the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission. The verb ‘nudge’ is used for a purpose as the Commission is not obliged to follow the demands of such an initiative, as they are neither in the case of the Council nor of the Parliament. 274, 275 The issue is further regulated by the secondary law recently redeveloped in the form of Regulation, 276 which lays down the conditions for exercising this right. 277 In contrast to the aforepresented political rights, the entire legal structure is regulated at the Union level, thus, without any interference of the Member States with regards to national legal regulations into the exercise of this right. Therefore, universal suffrage, repealing Council Decision (76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom) and the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage annexed to that Decision (2020/2220(INL) — 2022/0902(APP)) [2022] OJ C 465/171 Article 28 paragraph 1. 274 Anastasia Karatzia, ‘The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU institutional balance: On realism and the possibilities of affecting EU lawmaking’ (2017) 54/1 Common Market Law Review 180
71
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software