VÁCLAV ŠMEJKAL CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ which is currently the most prominent critic of the freedom of movement derived from the status of EU citizenship. 5 Nevertheless, free migration has become, due to the pressure of public opinion, a hot political issue that pushes some Member States to propose measures aimed against one of the fundamental freedoms of the EU. At the February EU summit, the European Commission promised to initiate changes to the basic secondary legislation governing the exercise of the rights of EU citizens while staying in other member countries, i.e. to Regulations 883/2004 6 and 492/2011 7 and the key Directive 2004/38. 8 Moreover, the gradual expansion of the rights of EU-migrants derived from the status of EU citizens seems to be a thing of the past also for the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). Comments pointing to “vanishing strands of EU citizenship” 9 or “rolling back EU free movement law” 10 have become frequent in posts dedicated to the current development. The following analysis is not focused on those changes that are “just” proposed but on the ones that already form a part of the applicable EU law. These are changes that have recently arisen from judgments of the CJEU and quickly become precedents for judges at an EU and national level. The ambition is not only to explain what novelty was brought in 2014–2016 by the CJEU in its decisions on EU-migration issues but also to estimate what is the extent and significance of these changes. In conclusion, this analysis seeks to answer the question whether the restrictive definition of certain rights of migrating EU citizens is just a symbolic reaction of the CJEU to a widespread discontent with the alleged overloading of national social systems, or whether there could be some real impact and importance for the further development of the EU. The CJEU as part of the problem Descriptions of where the current problems come from are generally very similar. The right to free movement, originally defined as a freedom for the economically active (workers and self-employed) became under the Maastricht Treaty (1992) the 5 ALAN TRAVIS, ‘Mass EU Migration into Britain is actually goods news for UK economy.’  The Guardian 18 February 2016, 2. 6 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems  OJ L 200, 1-49. 7 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union  OJ L 141, 1-12. 8 Directive (EC) 2004/38 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States  OJ L 158, 77-123. 9 CHARLOTTE O’BRIAN, ‘An insubstantial pageant fading: a vision of EU citizenship under the AG’s Opinion in C-308/14 Commission v UK’ (2015) accessed 20 April 2016. 10 STEVE PEERS, ‘The final UK renegotiation deal: immigration issues.’ (2016) accessed 20 April 2016.