EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

Prague, Czechia

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

[10] Decision of the Autorité de la Concurrence of 11 March 2004, Département de la Marne , n° 04-D-07. [11] Decision of the Autorité de la Concurrence of 18 October 2017, Pratiques mises en œuvre dans le secteur des revêtements de sols résilients , n° 17-D-20. [12] Decision of the Autorité de la Concurrence of 25 June 1997, Pratiques relevées dans le secteur du travail temporaire dans les départements de l’Is re et de la Savoie, n° 97-D-52. [13] Decision of the Autorité de la Concurrence of 29 September 2016, Pratiques mises en œuvre dans le secteur des prestations réalisées par les agences de mannequins , n° 16-D-20. [14] Decision of the Comisión Nacional de la Competencia of 31 July 2010, Transitarios , S/0120/08. [15] Decision of the Commission of 14 July 2020, Ethylene , AT.40410. [16] Decision of the Commission of 8 December 2017, International Skating Union’s Eli gibility rules , AT. 40208. [17] Decision of the Commission of 8 February 2017, Car battery recycling , (AT.40018). [18] Decision of the Competition and Markets Authority of 16 December 2016, Conduct in the modelling sector , CE/9859-14. [19] Decision of the Cour de cassation (chambre commerciale) of 27 May 2021, Société Somado , 18-23.261 / 18-23.699, CCASS:2021:CO00517. [20] Decision of the Cour de cassation (chambre sociale) of 2 March 2011, Reuters Finan cial Software , n° 09-40.547. [21] Decision of the Gazdasági Versenyhivatal of 21 February 2021, SZTMSZ , n° Vj/61/2017. [22] Decision of the General Court of 16 December 2020, International Skating Union v Commission , (T‑93/18), EU:T:2020:610. [23] Decision of the Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch of 4 May 2010, Anesthesiemedewerkers , NL: GHSHE: 2010: BM3366. [24] Decision of the Konkurrensverket of 20 September 2012, Hockeyligan , 501/2012 (1). [25] Decision of the Rechtbank ‘s-Hertogenbosch of 30 December 2009, Anesthesieme dewerkers , NL: RBSHE: 2009: BK8011. [26] Decision of the United State District Court of Columbia of 17 March 2011, U.S. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al. , n° 1:10-cv-01629. [27] Decision of the United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, of 23 March 1956, Ra dovich v. National Football League , 231 F.2d 620. [28] Decision of the United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, of 18 October 1976, Mackey v. NFL , 543 F.2d 606. [29] Decision of the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, of 20 December 2001, Todd v. Exxon Corp. , 275 F.3d 191. [30] Decision of the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, of 18 February 1957, Union Circulation Company v. Fed. Trade Com’n ., 241 F.2d 652. [31] Decision of the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, of 7 March 1967 , Nichols v. Spencer International Press, Inc ., 371 F.2d 332.

397